Skip to content

Ch11 Market Power, Collusion, and Oligopoly

Notes

Merger

horizontal integration

before merger: competitive (to where D=MC)
after merger: MC drops ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-1.png don't necessarily gain

if MC' << MC ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-2.png
P' lower than before merger
and both consumers & producer gain

if MC' = MC
ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-3.jpg deadweight loss

vertical integration

Say there's a upstream monopoly and downstream monopoly respectively. Upstream company would sell a monopoly price for downstream company, which is a part of the MC of downstream company. When they merge, Upstream would produces at MC = D, lowering the MC of downstream.

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-4.png

provide service

resale price ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-5.jpg

Oligopoly

cartel

A group of firms engaged in collusion

will fail due to prison dilemma, unless repeated

contestable market

firm can enter & exit costlessly ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-6.png P=MC=AC

natural monopoly in a contestable market ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-7.png

Cournot model

Cournot Model ==assumption: the rival has fixed quantity== i.e. take rivals' output as given ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-8.png

Bertrand model

Bertrand Model

==assumption: the rival has fixed price== i.e. take rivals' price as given, and assume the rival won't change it → will undercut its price as long as > MC s.t. it can capture the entire market → repeatedly undercut each's price → ==price = MC = competition price==

about Cournot & Bertrand model

if the assumptions fail, which is always the case, the models won't work

monopolistic competition

  • monopolistic competition
  • producing a product that differs sufficiently from the output of other producers that some consumers will have a distinct preference for it
  • basically same products with different branding
  • demand very elastic
  • Q = where MR = MC
  • short run : positive economic profits
  • long run : zero economic profits
    • TR = TC i.e. P = AC

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-9.png

HW

answer by 助教

N1

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-10.png

N2

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-11.png N2(b) N 先根據 \(P_M\) 定出 \(P_N\) 定出 Q,M 再根據 Q 定出 \(P_M\)

N3

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-12.png ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-13.png ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-14.png ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-15.png ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-16.png

N4

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-17.png 橋有先後
i.e. 2nd bridge take 1st as given in (b)
thus idendical with N2(b)

P15

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-18.png

P18 (Solve cases of 4 and 5 vendors)

ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-19.png http://gametheory101.com/tag/hotellings-game/ five vendors: ch11-market-power,-colusion,-and-obligopoly-20.png